Preston Candover & Nutley Parish Council comments

Unique Reference Number: 
BSGD-C6-LPU23-786
Status: 
Submitted
Author: 
Preston Candover and Nutley Parish Council
No. of documents attached: 
4
Author: 
Preston Candover and Nutley Parish Council

Comments

Policy ENV1: Landscape

Policy box, Figure or Paragraph Number: 
Comment

The Parish Council supports the principle that:

“Development proposals will only be permitted where it can be demonstrated, through a suitable assessment, that the proposals are sympathetic to the character and visual quality of the area concerned.”

 

The Parish Council also supports the principle that:

“Development proposals also need to take account of, but not limited to, identified features in Neighbourhood Plans, such as views and important open areas.”

 

However, the Parish Council suggests that reference to Neighbourhood Plans is too narrow. In the policy specifically related to Landscape, reference should also be made to Landscape Character Assessments.

 

The Parish Council supports the principle that:

“Landscapes of particularly high value outside of the National Landscape are identified as Valued Landscapes on the Policies map.  Development proposals will only be permitted in these areas where they protect and enhance features that contribute to the character, quality and interpretation of these landscapes.”

 

The Parish Council strongly supports the Valued Landscapes concept and agrees with the approach taken in Policy ENV1 in respect of Valued Landscape areas, which include The Ellisfield Valleys, Candover Valley Floor and Lower Valley Sides. The majority of the area covered by the Parish Council is therefore within the Valued Landscape designation. 

 

 

The Parish Council has the following observations in this context:

 

The Parish Council considers that development proposals in areas adjacent to Valued Landscapes have the potential to have a direct impact on Valued Landscape. Views across Valued Landscape will not end at the boundary of the Valued Landscape zones. Where it can be demonstrated that proposals located outside a Valued Landscape zone would adversely affect the character, quality and interpretation of the Valued Landscape they should not be permitted.  Rather, proposals in areas adjacent to Valued Landscape should demonstrate that they maintain and enhance the particular landscape attributes of the Valued Landscape.

 

 

The Parish Council notes that within the key to the Draft Policies Map Booklet Regulation 18 Consultation January 2024, it states “Valued Landscape ENV1 (precise boundaries to be defined post Reg 18).”  The Parish Council has the following observations about how those boundaries should be drawn:

 

The Valued Landscape Study of February 2023 split the Candover Valley into two separate parcels namely, the valley floor and lower slopes in one parcel (I1) and the upper slopes in another parcel (I2). As a result of this separation, the proposed Valued Landscape area on the Local Plan Update (Regulation 18) Policy Map designates area I1 as Valued Landscape but not I2. 

 

However, in the Landscape Character Assessment Document of May 2021, the Candover Valley was treated as a single parcel (Character Area 20).  The Parish Council considers that the May 2021 approach is more logical and appropriate. The Candover Valley is a “well defined linear valley landform” the upper slopes are as integral to the valley form as the lower ones. It is artificial to separate the lower from upper slopes.  Development on either level will impact the other. In particular, the Parish Council notes that settlement on the upper valley slopes is very limited, with only the occasional isolated farmstead.  Development on these upper slopes would damage the rural character of the area and have a detrimental effect on the whole of the valley

 

The Parish Council suggests that the Valued Landscape designation be applied to the whole of the geographical area covered by Character Area 20 rather than being limited to parcel I1.

 

If this approach is not accepted, the Parish Council would like to understand the logic behind excluding the following geographical pockets from I1 and instead placing them in parcel I2, the Parish Council suggests there is merit in including each of the following areas in parcel I1 ie designating as Valued Landscape:

 

            Land to the North of Damsel’s Lane between parcel I1 and J1;

 

Land to the West of Chappell’s Wood in Nutley and Land on the East Side of the B3046 between Nutley and Axford;

 

Land to the East of Preston Grange in Preston Candover.

Policy EMP4: Rural Economy

Policy box, Figure or Paragraph Number: 
Comment

The Parish Council supports the principle that the need for new jobs is not limited to villages and towns. The Parish Council agrees that Basingstoke and Dean boasts a wealth of non-traditional rural businesses including digital tech.  However, the Parish Council would also make the observation that there are several areas within its boundaries that do not benefit from fibre optic broadband and there is no clear information about when that might change.  Digital tech businesses and the like depend on the necessary infrastructure being in place and that is not the case in all rural areas currently.

Policy HSG1: New Housing in the Countryside

Policy box, Figure or Paragraph Number: 
Comment

The Parish Council supports the approach taken in Policy HSG1. 

 

The Parish Council has the following observations in this context:

Guidance about what is covered by “previously developed land” would be helpful.  For example, would an area that had been developed as a solar farm or some other renewable energy source be regarded as having been “previously developed”? The Parish Council suggests that such a development is quite different from a building development and should not be regarded as “previously developed land” for this purpose.

 

“Where a local housing need has been accepted it will be necessary to require the property to be preferentially marketed to local people to ensure the new home has an opportunity to meet that identified need.”

 

The Parish Council understands the desirability, where a local housing need has been identified, that new housing is made available to local people.  However, it is unclear how preferential marketing would, of itself, achieve that ambition.  It is also unclear how the preferential marketing would be done.

Policy HSG3: Rural Exception Sites and First Home Rural Exception Sites

Policy box, Figure or Paragraph Number: 
Comment

The Parish Council would like to understand how these policies apply to developments within or adjacent to a Valued Landscape zone. Would a proposal for a Rural Exception Site or Single Plot Rural Exception Site within a Valued Landscape zone only be permitted where it also complies with Policy ENV1?  The Parish Council would support that approach and suggests this be made clear in Policy HSG3 and Policy HSG4.

Policy ENV10: Managing Flood Risk

Policy box, Figure or Paragraph Number: 
Comment

The Candover valley is known for the risk of flooding including sub surface flooding – reference is made to the government surface flooding map. Generation of overland flow (runoff) occurs through a variety of mechanisms that are primarily controlled by the infiltration capacity of the surface (soil, vegetation) and the rate of precipitation. The infiltration capacity of the surface is influenced by the porosity of the surface and by how much of the soil is already full of water (saturation). The generation of runoff is strongly determined by the amount of precipitation falling at a given time on that surface – the precipitation rate, and over longer periods of time by the degree of soil saturation – a function of rate of drainage of soil and total time integrated rainfall. Thus, in wet winters, as experienced this winter, progressive rainfall accumulations over weeks, result in saturated soils and progressively higher runoff rates. Similarly, convective storms with high precipitation rates, can generate very high runoff simply because the rate of precipitation is far greater than the rate of infiltration.

Information

Unique Reference Number: 
BSGD-C6-LPU23-786
Status: 
Submitted
No. of documents attached: 
4