Development at Popham is not acceptable because:
• This greenfield development is the least sustainable way to meet housing need, and would put an unacceptable strain on local...
Submissions by topics "Policy SPS5.5"
|
|
To whom it may concern: Popham Airfield
I read with some alarm that Popham airfield is being considered for development. I visit Popham regularly as the only source of the type of... |
|
Please, please, please don’t take away Popham Airfield. We are losing airfields at an alarming rate because they are considered brownfield sites so developers have their greedy eyes on them. Once...
|
Please read my objections attached to the Garden Village proposal at Popham.
Regards, Kate.
I write to object to the plans to develop a Garden Village at Popham Airfield.
I have lived...
|
|
Dear Sirs,
Please find attached my objection to the above proposal at Popham Airfield which I would like to lodge with the Planning Department.
Yours faithfully
John Chape - Pilot...
|
Dear Sir / Madam - I would like to object to the proposed development at Popham airfield SPS5.5 15.53 4th March 2024
My comments ref the proposal to develop Popham airfield...
|
|
Dear All
I am writing on behalf of the membership of the British Rotorcraft Association (BRA) the organisation which represents the gyroplane community within the UK and is overseen and...
|
Dear sir,
It was recently drawn to my attention that there is the threat of Popham Airfield being exploited by a building proposal by profiting developers.
I would like to highlight my...
|
|
Dear Sirs,
I would like to comment on the draft updated Local Plan for Basingstoke and Deane, specifically on the proposed Policy SPS5.5: Popham Garden Village. By adopting Policy SPS.5 Popham...
|
As residents of Micheldever Village for the past 9 years we feel that these proposed developments would place extra pressure on the village roads and parking at Micheldever Station which already...
|